[urq] stock WR vs. ported WX headBrandon Rogers brogers at terrix.com
Thu Jul 15 11:40:10 EDT 2004
Mike- The WR and WX are the same head. The difference lies in the cam. So if you don't have the WR cam to go with the WR head, you're proably better off power-wise with the ported WX, this is assuming both have comaprable life left.. Now if you do have the cam, I'd probably put the WR cam in the ported WX head..... Brandon ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Fitton" <rfitton at vt.edu> To: <urq at audifans.com> Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2004 6:55 PM Subject: [urq] stock WR vs. ported WX head > Overall, which do you think is a better choice. Why? Do the WR heads > also crack? Do they also have solid lifters? Anyone know the cam specs > for the two heads? Are the cams interchangable? > > -Cheers! > Mike > > _______________________________________________ > Audifans urq mailing list > Send posts to: mailto:urq at audifans.com > Manage your list connection: http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/urq > Have an urq question? Check the Audifans Knowledgebase! > http://www.audi-quattro.org/cgi-bin/twiki/view/Audi/UrQuattro > Have an urq answer? ... Please help others by adding to the KB ... all contributions welcome!
More information about the urq mailing list