[200q20v] Re: [s-cars] Usefullness of the Front Undertray

[Peter Schulz]

At 10:55 AM 7/30/2001 -0700, Arun Rao wrote:
>Robert Myers wrote:
> >
> > My '89 200tq had one.
>
>They must have been trying to save weight :-) -- haven't ever seen a '91
>200Q with one of these.  I've had mine since 37K, and I don't think the
>original owner did much of anything other than get the brake retrofit.
>
>-Arun
>
>'91 200Q, 140K (no tray, but original battery!)
>'00 S4, 29K
>
>--
>Arun Rao
>Pixar Animation Studios
>1200 Park Ave
>Emeryville, CA 94608
>(510) 752-3526
>_______________________________________________
>200q20v mailing list
>200q20v at audifans.com
>http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/200q20v


I would think that it might have something to due with the UFO brakes.  The 
91 200 has ducts under the bumper that are supposed to help duct cooling 
air to the UFO rotors.

Otherwise, Audi would have probably continued using the 10v 200 undertray.

A good question would be to the V8 list - did their undertray change when 
Audi stopped building them with UFO brakes?



Peter Schulz
1990 CQ
1991 200 20v TQW
Chelmsford, MA USA
peschulz at cisco.com