Cat Back Exhaust for 2K 20V TQ

[Peter Schulz]

At 12:58 PM 2/11/2002 -0800, Chris Covington wrote:
>I, personally, think that a cat-back system is pointless unless yours is on
>the way out and/or you just want to hear more noise.  The stock cat-back
>exhaust system flows fine, even on my friend's RS2-equipped 200q20v wagon.
>
>Maybe there's something to be gained from a cat-FORWARD exhaust system,
>though.
>
>Chris
>'91 200q20v

Chris:

said wagon needs a new mid muffler $$$$ from Audi.
Doubt the rest of the exhaust would stand up to just having that muffler
replaced.

mentioned 3" inch downpipe & cat convertor and back exhaust is SS, and cost
me $400.
Larger diameter exhaust for turbo applications has its
benefits.  One  three inch pipe has more flow than the two factory 2.25s
has been discussed extensively on this and the S car lists, as have the
benefits of the 3 inch downpipe.


So there ;^p....


;^)

-peter




Peter Schulz
1990 CQ
1991 200 20v TQW indigo mica
1991 200 20v TQW titanium grey
Chelmsford, MA USA
peschulz at cisco.com