Strut tower brace

Bernie Benz b.benz at charter.net
Fri Dec 8 15:23:36 EST 2006



> From: "Eric Huppert" <dragracer at netstep.net>
> 
> 91 200 20V:
> 
> Post lower control arm bushing failure and subsequent replacement the 20V
> needs aligned. (Also replaced bad outer sway bar bushings) Receipts from
> previous owner showed camber adjustment was maxed out on last alignment.
> Have the fairly typical crack in on right side from towers creeping in. Car
> is a daily driver, not tracked, blah, blah, blah..
> 
> Have read all the info for strut tower braces I could find, but most info
> applies to the type 44 10V's. Is everything the same for the 200 20V? Am
> assuming I'll need the brake reservoir also...
Big diff. between Strut and Tower braces! See Chris Miller¹s 200-20V site
for much past discussion and the design for my strut brace.
All the 44 chassis cars are the same in this respect. Also, a preloaded
strut brace will give additional positive camber and maximize the
suspension¹s lateral stiffness.

Bernie
 
> If my son was here with the 90 200 I'd check it out, but seeing as this is
> on my mind now figured I'd throw it out "there".
> 
> Plan is to have a friend (with all sorts of machines) make a adjustable
> cross brace and use the s4/s6 strut tower braces. Will install and put some
> preload into it in small increments, than have alignment done.
> 
> Thoughts?



More information about the 200q20v mailing list