fun topic: 200q20v VS. URS4
Rbade12 at aol.com
Rbade12 at aol.com
Fri Jul 11 10:52:35 PDT 2008
I can't speak to the mechanical differences between the 2, but, I am with
you as far as looks go! I think the 200q20v is a beautiful automobile.......I
don't necessarily like the straight 200/100/500, I think it's a bit slab sided
and too tall/spindly. The S4 is a nice looking car, and the enthusiast eye
can see a difference between it and an A4 [kind of like the difference between
an SHO and a Taurus], but, it does break into the whole roundy thing that
happened in the late 80's [with the Taurus leading the way] and ,you're right,
a lot of cars look like it.
Bob
In a message dated 7/11/2008 11:40:55 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
centaurus3200 at yahoo.com writes:
finally, i don't know about you guys, but the 200q20v looks much more sexy
and original than the URS4. the 200q20v has, at least to me, has the perfect
combination of swoopy lines, but still some sharp edges for contrast. the URS4
always looked like a bloated A4 to me. sort of just looked like everything
else on the road.
**************Get the scoop on last night's hottest shows and the live music
scene in your area - Check out TourTracker.com!
(http://www.tourtracker.com?NCID=aolmus00050000000112)
More information about the 200q20v
mailing list