fun topic: 200q20v VS. URS4

[Rbade12 at aol.com]

I can't speak to the mechanical differences between the 2, but, I am with  
you as far as looks go! I think the 200q20v is a beautiful automobile.......I  
don't necessarily like the straight 200/100/500, I think it's a bit slab sided  
and too tall/spindly. The S4 is a nice looking car, and  the enthusiast eye 
can see a difference between it and an A4 [kind of  like the difference between 
an SHO and a Taurus], but, it does break into the  whole roundy thing that 
happened in the late 80's [with the Taurus leading the  way] and ,you're right, 
a lot of cars look like it.
 
Bob
 
 
In a message dated 7/11/2008 11:40:55 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
centaurus3200 at yahoo.com writes:

finally,  i don't know about you guys, but the 200q20v looks much more sexy 
and original  than the URS4. the 200q20v has, at least to me, has the perfect 
combination of  swoopy lines, but still some sharp edges for contrast. the URS4 
always looked  like a bloated A4 to me. sort of just looked like everything 
else on the  road.





**************Get the scoop on last night's hottest shows and the live music 
scene in your area - Check out TourTracker.com!      
(http://www.tourtracker.com?NCID=aolmus00050000000112)