200q20v entry on the Knowledgebase (chris locke)

[christopher locke]

OK.  A public apology.  I'm sorry for the improper use of the term "d'oh".  It was not intended negatively, but as an expression of "wow."  I do not watch television.  I haven't in 10 years.  Homer simpson isn't my native language.  Using the context clues of the remainder of my post (that is great!!!!!!!  Just to know it's there is great!  Thanks!) does the remainder of the post seem negatively intended?

My apologies.  
I made a mistake.  
It shall not happen again.    

chris



Message: 1
Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2010 08:19:42 -0500
From: Phil Rose <pjrose at frontiernet.net>
Subject: Re: 200q20v entry on the Knowledgebase
To: Kent McLean <kentmclean at comcast.net>
Cc: 200q20v at audifans.com
Message-ID: <a06240801c7a58cb3855d@[192.168.254.3]>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" ; format="flowed"

At 1:21 PM -0500 2/19/10, Kent McLean wrote:
>Phil Rose wrote:
>>At 2:15 PM -0800 2/18/10, christopher locke wrote:
>>>DOH that is great!!!!!!!!!  Just to know it's there is great!  Thanks!
>>
>>"DOH"????????
>
><http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doh!>
>
>HTH.

Kent,
Thanks,  I'm aware of that wiki.  I'd already checked it before I 
posted, ( to be certain of the accepted use of the expression, D'OH).
BTW, here's the "definition" given in that wiki; it's exactly what I 
take as the meaning:

"used to comment on an action perceived as foolish or stupid."

Based on that widespread understanding of the expression, my post was 
intended to question the OP's intent in using DOH in his post. Words 
do have meanings. It seemed pretty negative (and probably 
inappropriate) kind of expression to use there. This one doesn't 
convey what the user intended ("WOW"). Perhaps he can be excused if 
"Homer Simpson" isn't his native language. ;-)

Phil
-- 

Phil Rose
Rochester, NY
mailto:pjrose at frontiernet.net