[Es2] 3B vs. AAN

[Tom Saltino]

The intake on that one has had the inlet moved forward, BTW.

T-bone

From: "c" <really at idontgivearats.com>
Date: 2004/02/18 Wed AM 11:12:05 EST
To: <es2 at audifans.com>
Subject: Re: [Es2] 3B vs. AAN

Here is a pic of an AAN, where the rad is angled and the IM has had a
connecting intake from the IC custom done. This was on a Canadian conv that
was done at leat 3-4 years ago.
http://20v.org/b5/aan.jpg

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matt twentyV" <matt_20v at yahoo.com>
To: "Patrick Yam" <pkyam at bitstream.net>; <es2 at audifans.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 11:00 AM
Subject: Re: [Es2] 3B vs. AAN


>
> --- Patrick Yam <pkyam at bitstream.net> wrote:
> > What are the main transplant issues concerning
> > choosing 3B versus AAN?
> >
> > Pat
> In the end AAN will cost you more but is more
> desirable simply because it is newer.  The biggest
> issue is the IM, the AAN IM wants the TB to be
> in the upper quadrant of the radiator whereas the 3B
> puts it behind the motor- IC to TB plumbing on pass.
> side vs. driver side.


_______________________________________________
Es2 mailing list
Es2 at audifans.com
http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/es2