turbo motor in an 86 4kq

[Todd Phenneger]

I was just pointing out that everyone was saying, YES,
Thats the one, thats the good one.  And I was saying
that its not the ONLY good one but is a good one.
l8r
  TOdd

--- JShadzi at aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 8/21/00 11:24:11 PM Pacific
> Daylight Time, 
> tquattroguy at yahoo.com writes:
> 
> << Yes,
>   But everyone is forgetting that the 86 MC is not
> the
>  optimal engine.  Sure, Its better than a KH which
> is
>  better than an ur-q which is better than early Non
> IC
>  Turbo.  But the MC-2 is better still, and the 3B
>  better yet (although in a different league all
>  together).
>    Yes, its a great engine and one of the preferred
>  options however its not the only one lets remember.
>    l8r >>
> 
>     You are correct, there are lots of options, but
> don't forget that the 
> original post was asking if an '86 MC was a good
> choice...a Trans-Am motor 
> and management system is even a better choice yet (I
> know of one for sale)   
> ;)
> Javad
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Quattro mailing list 	Quattro at audifans.com
> To remove yourself, change to digest mode, or
> temporarily stop delivery
> please visit the web interface at
> http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/quattro


=====
Todd Phenneger
    83' ur-q (awaiting a 20vt)
    84' 4ktq  fun but I'm sick of CIS.

__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Mail – Free email you can access from anywhere!
http://mail.yahoo.com/