Was: driving impressionsNow:bandwidth waste
james accordino
ssgacc at yahoo.com
Fri Dec 1 07:17:07 EST 2000
--- isham-research.freeserve.co.uk at pop.pol.net.uk,
quk at isham-research.freeserve.co.uk wrote:
> > What is it with your perpetual bad aditude? Can't
> you get unlimited
> > bandwidth over there? Life it to short to worry
> about 6.7k.
>
> Even if you have no value for my contributions,
> which it seems obvious
> you don't - spare a thought for Dan. He's had to
> fund the bandwidth
> to ship out 1,500 copies of that 6.7KB. Care to
> work out how much
> it would cost him if everyone were so inconsiderate?
>
> Welcome to the killfile. It has one entry.
>
Another perspective on the bandwidth deal. I use free
ISP's over here. They work O.K., but I wonder how
they WOULD work if they weren't processing trillions
of bits of bullsh*t sent by thoughtless a$$e$. Ever
checked AOL when the kiddies get out of school. 200
pages of 1 key being held down sent to 1500 people.
It seems most of the worst bandwidth offenders have
free access to someone elses T1 or other highspeed
connection, so they couldn't give a rats a$$ about you
or I.
Jim Accordino
More information about the quattro
mailing list