[urq] Re: [s-cars] Re: T-giving play and some notes...

[c a l i b a n]

	hmmmmmm, interesting.  i looked at the comparison graph on
	nokian's site - 
	http://www.nokiantires.com/img/WinterTyreTypeComparison.gif

	i kind of like the unstudded hakka 1's position over the q.
	i would like a bit more advantage in wet and dry grip, as
	2/3 of my ride to tahoe each weekend is snowless - either 
	dry or wet, but no snow.  still, the q looks good...

	i WISH i could see a similar graph with other tires included!
	(non-nokian)

On Mon, 27 Nov 2000, Bob Davis wrote:

]on 11/27/00 3:53 PM, c a l i b a n at caliban at sharon.net wrote:
]
]> 
]> so, do all hakka 1's come with stud holes?
]
]Yes.  Studding is optional on them.
]
]>From my experience though, Hakka Q's are the better non-studded option.
]They're designed to not use studs.
]
]>From a sheer digging standpoint, though, hakka 1's are hard to beat (really
]good in mud season).
]
]I'm running Arctic Alpin's this year on my S6 - if it snows I'll let you
]know how they are (Portsmouth is still warm).
]
]bob
]
]

-- 
 rocky mullin - chaotic good
 http://caliban.sf.ca.us/
 two strokes are faster than four!
 this message was composed using the vi editor.