Boost vs. WGFV DC and DC vs. Temperature
John Shost
j_shost at excite.com
Fri Apr 6 07:50:17 EDT 2001
It's torque controlled, so you would need less boost at lower temperatures.
What are you reading for torque?
On Wed, 04 Apr 2001 20:58:31 -0700, Wallace White wrote:
> Larry -
>
> Your duty cycle observations fit with what I've seen, in my limited
> observation. I haven't seen more than 50% duty, even with my QLCC 1.8
> bar chip. At colder temperatures the peak duty is lower.
>
> But those peak DC values were very brief, just right when I first hit
> WOT. Then the pressure rises quickly and the DC decreases. It's like a
> servo-controlled motor system, where the controller uses PWM
> proportional to the distance from the target.
>
> Maybe your WGFV is partially blocked? Then it can't do quite as much
> good as it should?
>
> Wait a second, you should be getting 1.2 bar (or 1.1 indicated at least)
> without the WGFV cycling at all. (Or is that affected by ambient
> pressure?) What pressure do you get if you electrically disconnect the
> WGFV?
>
> - Wallace
> '87 5kcstq 172k
>
> > Something that threw me for a loop was an extreme ambient temperature
> > dependence on maximum DC. I find my DC changes with ambient
temperature
> > approximately hitting the following points: <40F=<10%, 50F=25%,
55F=30%,
> > 60F=40% and >65F=50%. Boost follows that predicted by duty cycle.
This
> > doesn't seem right but I haven't identified what is causing it. It
> > definitely reduces my boost in the winter. Maybe I need to move to
Florida.
_______________________________________________________
Send a cool gift with your E-Card
http://www.bluemountain.com/giftcenter/
More information about the quattro
mailing list