90Q 4sale OR need parts.....surely not to a woman

[Orin Eman]

> 
> I just stated a FACT, the car was driven by the owners wife, a woman.  I
> never drew a conclusion, and if check the rest of the comments I was just
> adding them as space on the page permitted, most observations are just
> that.

"This was driven by a women, curb marks on all wheels."

You would have an argument if that comma was a period.  It isn't
and the offending text is _still_ on the web site.

 If this was the intent, I would have mentioned this fact in the
> beginning as a means of explanation for all the dings and dents.  Since
> YOU read so much more into, AND drew all those conclusions from the
> statement of fact, you have issues.

Trying to hide behind 'statement of fact'?  No, I don't think you are
trying to hide, but it's coming across that way.  You have "This was driven
by a woman", a complete sentence, followed by "marks on all wheels" which
isn't a sentence, lacking a verb, so it can easily be construed as
adding information to the preceding clause.  When expecting people to
fill in the missing words, why should we put 'there are' in rather
than 'so' or 'hence'?

 You COULD have just had a little
> netiquette and written me privately, and not resorted to name calling and
> the rest of the drivel in your post.   

'Drivel'?  This does nothing to defend your position and in
fact makes you look worse.

Orin.