Lincoln LS

[Rave Racer]

        In this case, I would have to agree.  Some have had many problems
with their Audis.  Some foreseable, some not.  The list has helped solve
many problems, alot of them repeatedly.  I have not had any problems that I
didn't know about since I bought the car.  The list would take all night to
type up, but at least I am aware of all the probs.  I have only been
stranded by my car within the month of buying it because the owner before me
did not understand the car.  After I sorted them out, everything has been
smooth sailing since.

> William Ng writes:
> > Some of you
> > may not like what I'm about to write, but Honda's level of reliability
> > should shame any Audi engineer. With the mountain of work my 200-TQ
needs,
> > Audi reliability is a magnitude below Japanese reliability.
>
> You know, the 200tq is a type-44 Audi, and these cars have their share of
> problems mostly because they are complex beasts, and Audi was there
> building these highly sophisticated cars well ahead of their time.  To
> compare the 200tq to the simple CRX is not exactly a fair comparison.
> Try someone who has one of the earlier Acura Legends... they are worst
> than the 200tq in having problems.  So there goes "the Honda level of
> reliability"...  Somehow, this notion that Hondas are reliable have become
> self-fulfilling prophesies.  People believe that Hondas are reliable, so
> when somethings break, they justify as "needed maintenance", whereas when
> something breaks on an Audi, a likely reaction would be that the Audi is
> a piece of cr*p.  Conditioned response, you know.
>
> Moreover, to categorize ALL Audis as unreliable based only on your
experience
> on the 200tq is not fair either.  Other Audi models have had much less
> problems, particularly the newer ones.
>
> Yes, Audi had build some troublesome models, but so did/do most other
> marques.
>
>