to buy or not to buy...
JShadzi at aol.com
JShadzi at aol.com
Wed May 23 11:30:53 EDT 2001
Good point Mike, but I will qualify Peymon's statemet with "depending on how
much it costs".
I think we can all agree that non-running cars, for the right price, are a
treasure, but not if they are being pased off at running car prices.
Javad
In a message dated 5/23/2001 6:27:30 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
armanmik at n-jcenter.com writes:
<<
"Any car that you can't drive home is definately not work paying for."
So that's what I've been doing wrong all thse years! I guess I should not
have bought the 1969 BMW R-50 with 4,000 original miles on it for $250
because the front wheel was bent and I couldn't drive it home. Or the 1968
Munch Mammoth showing 497 miles for $2,000, which had a dead battery. Or
the 1967 Cessna 150 for $4,000 because the starter was bad (or does that
not count because I had to fly it home, not drive it?) Or the car I've been
driving for five years now, a very nice 86 5Ks for $400 - broken rod,
arrived by towtruck...
>>
More information about the quattro
mailing list