to buy or not to buy...
    JShadzi at aol.com 
    JShadzi at aol.com
       
    Wed May 23 11:30:53 EDT 2001
    
    
  
Good point Mike, but I will qualify Peymon's statemet with "depending on how 
much it costs".  
I think we can all agree that non-running cars, for the right price, are a 
treasure, but not if they are being pased off at running car prices.
Javad
In a message dated 5/23/2001 6:27:30 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
armanmik at n-jcenter.com writes:
<< 
 "Any car that you can't drive home is definately not work paying for."
 
 
 
 So that's what I've been doing wrong all thse years! I guess I should not
 have bought the 1969 BMW R-50 with 4,000 original miles on it for $250
 because the front wheel was bent and I couldn't drive it home. Or the 1968
 Munch Mammoth showing 497 miles for $2,000, which had a dead battery. Or
 the 1967 Cessna 150 for $4,000 because the starter was bad (or does that
 not count because I had to fly it home, not drive it?) Or the car I've been
 driving for five years now, a very nice 86 5Ks for $400 - broken rod,
 arrived by towtruck...
  >>
    
    
More information about the quattro
mailing list