to buy or not to buy...

ReD4000QuATTRo at aol.com ReD4000QuATTRo at aol.com
Wed May 23 23:02:25 EDT 2001


In a message dated 5/23/01 6:27:30 AM Pacific Daylight Time, 
armanmik at n-jcenter.com writes:


> So that's what I've been doing wrong all thse years! I guess I should not
> have bought the 1969 BMW R-50 with 4,000 original miles on it for $250
> because the front wheel was bent and I couldn't drive it home. Or the 1968
> Munch Mammoth showing 497 miles for $2,000, which had a dead battery. Or
> the 1967 Cessna 150 for $4,000 because the starter was bad (or does that
> not count because I had to fly it home, not drive it?) Or the car I've been
> driving for five years now, a very nice 86 5Ks for $400 - broken rod,
> 


You're right!  The problem isn't so much how the car drives...it is the 
driver!  Any driver to buy a 1969 Munch Mammoth for 2000 definately knows 
what he's talking about.  I'm sorry I made such a foolish comment.  I retract 
it.  By the way, are you selling any of your vintage cars?

Peymon
86 4KQ

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.audifans.com/pipermail/quattro/attachments/20010523/2b75cfab/attachment.htm


More information about the quattro mailing list