Burglary was SF Gate: Freak fire traps man inside Audi/Battery failure a p

[TM]

If it was Arizona, the homeowner should have just shot and killed
the burglar- IIRC, you are allowed to exercise deadly force to protect
property in that state. Then there are no stupid mental anguish
lawsuits-
it's awfully hard for a dead person to testify against you.

Taka

-----Original Message-----
From: quattro-admin at audifans.com [mailto:quattro-admin at audifans.com] On
Behalf Of Larry C Leung
Sent: Tuesday, January 15, 2002 8:18 PM
To: ScottyCBoy at aol.com
Cc: l.leung at juno.com; quattro at audifans.com
Subject: Re: Burglary was SF Gate: Freak fire traps man inside
Audi/Battery failure a p


Wasn't NY, from what I recall, it was Arizona. And it was probably a
civil suit, which means things are totally different (majority opinion,
and all that). All I can say is that d__n burgular had was some slick
lawyer.

LL - NY

On Tue, 15 Jan 2002 11:46:50 EST ScottyCBoy at aol.com writes:
>In a message dated 1/15/2002 8:57:51 AM Central Standard Time,
>l.leung at juno.com writes:
>
><< Owner found the would be burgular (already called the cops due to
>the  strange van in the drive) in the garage surviving off of the cat
>food in
> the garage and water from the washing machine.
>
> Cops picked up the guy, who promptly turns around and sues the owner
>for  mental anguish.....and WINS! >>
>
>This can't be true! Are New York Juries that stupid?
>
>Scott