RS2 turbocharger

[JShadzi at aol.com]

--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]

> <<Sounds like many could benefit from spending some money on a turbo dyno
> (yup they have those).  Maps easily indicate how far "off" you are in
> sizing.  In the world of choices, opening up too much top end almost always
> COMES at the expense of low end.  I say if you don't ever need or will
> never need the 800+cfm, go smaller and get back the low end.
>
> The basic recommendations for matching turbos is in several publications,
> including Corky Bell's.  If you haven't taken a gander at a turbo MAP and
> understand how it works, going BIG is a sell, not necessarily a wise
> decision.  I've seen many a post here wrt "bigger=better" where the turbo
> never gets to it's peak turbo CE.  Better ways to skin that cat IMO/E.>>


Agreed, many think that bigger=better, I know its not the case.  Bigger is
better up to a certain point/size, and for me, and the power I'd like to
develop, the K26 or K26 are too small, I've found great results with the
T3/T4 hybrids.

> <<Once Bob and I get your EFI straightened out Javad, it will be plunked on
> an RS2 turbo equipped 5ktq with a monter IC, and 4.11 gears.  Looking
> forward to even less lag than it has now.
> >>


Looking forward to it  =)

Javad