Hindenburg (ustabe History repeating itself (NAC))
Burl Vibert
blur at sympatico.ca
Sun Mar 17 09:58:14 EST 2002
Robert Myers wrote:
>
> At 04:57 AM 3/17/02, Phil Payne wrote:
>
> > > >The Hindenburg was filled with HELIUM - not Hydrogen - which is what
> > led to
> > > >her demise! Helium is flammable, and explosive - Hydrogen is safe! VERY
> > > >SAFE!
> > >
> > > NO! NO! NO!!!!! NO * 10^3!!!! That is absolutely bassackwards!! The
> > > Hindenburg was using Hydrogen which is __EXTREMELY__ flammable. Helium is
> > > essentially inert. That is why we have been discussing using Hydrogen, not
> > > Helium, as a fuel.
> >
> >Very true, but even so the Hindenburg would seem to have been the victim
> >of something other
> >than a hydrogen fire. Hydrogen fires are almost colourless.
> The fabric and paint and God (and perhaps some long ago German engineer?)
> only knows what other components of the airship may well fully account for
> the observed color of the Hindenberg flames.
The fabric covering of the Hindenburg was doped with a layer of iron
oxide covered with coats of cellulose butyrate acetate mixed with
powdered aluminum. Kinda like solid rocket fuel. Neat huh?
Burl Vibert
1987 5kcstq
Kingston, Ontario
More information about the quattro
mailing list