Has anyone run 195/60-15 on 4000Q?

[Yoder, Wm. Douglas]

You're assuming those radar stations to be accurate...

While I'm sure the radar guns themselves are accurate, I'd bet the
stations display an incorrect speed, just to psych people out.

-Doug

Kwattro at aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 4/8/2003 2:04:43 PM Eastern Standard Time, ti at amb.org writes:
>
>
>>195/60-15 has too large a rolling circumference for the 4Kq and would
>>cause your speedometer to read low and the effective final
>>drive ratio
>>to be made higher
>
>
> Just for shits and giggles, my 4000CS Quattro runs 205-60-15 snows, and reads dead accurate passing standing radar stations (IE< Your speed is :)  Weird, huh.  Should be way off...
>
> Later!
> Carter
>

--
*------------------*--------------------*------------------------------*
|    Doug Yoder    |   wdy at zordok.net   |    http://www.zordok.net/    |
*------------------*--------------------*------------------------------*
|  Don't tell me the sky's the limit...                                |
|                                  ...there's footprints on the moon.  |
*----------------------------------------------------------------------*