my take on torque, ad infinitum ................

[SJ]

> From: Orin Eman <orin at drizzle.com>
> Subject: Re: my take on torque, ad infinitum ................
> To: syljay at optonline.net (SJ)
> > > Subject: Re: Re: my take on torque, ad infinitum ................
> > ****Actually, it seems that the secret of the bolt torque value died
with
> > the tool designer.
>
> Didn't Phil get it from an UrQ fiche that had with/without 2079 specs?
> These being the 350/450 Nm or 258/332 ft-lb numbers?
**** Good question.
I'm trying to locate and verify the source document for these numbers. If
you are right, then the problem is solved.
I'll assume that there is no significant difference between crank bolt on
the UrQ engine and any other I-5 engine.


PHIL
Where did these numbers come from? We want to end the debate here . .before
somebody torques somebody elses head off.


SJ
85 Dodge PU, D-250, 318, auto
85 Audi 4k - - sold but still on the road
88 Audi 5kq
90 Audi 100q