4K v. 80/90 for a turbo transplant

[JShadzi at aol.com]

Well, if you're going to do a 4kq, and if you do it like Marc... then I recommend a 4kq =)

Javad

In a message dated 12/9/2003 2:41:57 PM Eastern Standard Time, Marc Swanson <mswanson at sonitrol.net> writes:

>On Tue, 2003-12-09 at 14:33, Mark L. Chang wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 09, 2003 at 01:04:44PM -0500 or thereabouts, Huw Powell wrote:
>> > I'd use an 80/90Q.  Much more refined design, "tighter" chassis/body 
>> > feel, galvanized body, lower air resistance/quieter... etc.  Also easier 
>> > to put good rear speakers into.
>> 
>> Plus no need to keep a stock of door handles around.
>
>
>agreed, just plain mo-bettah.
>
>If I had to do the turbo conversion all over again I'd start with a type
>89 instead of a type 85 if nothing other than for the protection from
>rust that galvanization gives you.
>
>Best Regards
>-- 
>-Marc
>87' 4ktq
>88' 90q
>www.mswanson.com/audi
>
>_______________________________________________
>quattro mailing list
>quattro at audifans.com
>http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/quattro
>