Audi 4kq 20v pics

[JShadzi at aol.com]

Glad the parts came in handy, the 20v has marginally more power than the 2.2 you replaced (yes, 30% power increase in marginal IMO, once you hit 50/60% now you're talking, plus the torque to back it up).  Turbo will get the power pouring on, keep us all posted.

Javad

In a message dated 2/9/2003 11:26:24 AM Eastern Standard Time, Jason Mawhinney <jmawhinney at nc.rr.com> writes:

>I'm slightly disappointed with the power.  It is respectable but not a
>turbo car.  The mistake I made was that I didn't drive a 20v NA before we
>installed this engine.  The 20v does have a bunch more top end but is
>definitely lacking in the torque department.  I do have plans to
>turbocharge this car in the future.  I have seen that it can be done (Alan
>Kramer's 7A turbo from www.grandtouring.org) but wonder how much
>fabrication will have to be done.  All I need now is to buy a house with a
>big garage so I can get to work and make it happen!  ;)
>Jason
>PS  Javad, you do realize this car has some of your car's old parts in it?
>
>
>At 10:36 AM 2/9/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>>--
>>[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
>>Jason, great looking swap, I also like how you've updated to the later dash
>>pieces, good job.  How does the car feel with the 20v compared to the stock
>>motor?
>>
>>Javad
>>
>>In a message dated 2/8/2003 5:11:00 PM Pacific Standard Time,
>>jmawhinney at nc.rr.com writes:
>>
>> >
>> > Sorry about the bum link.  This should get you there.
>> > Jason
>> >
>> > http://photos.yahoo.com/bc/jamawhinney/lst?.dir=/%2785+4kq+20v&.src=ph&
>> > .order=&.view=t&.done=http%3a//photos.yahoo.com/
>> >
>
>