Step by step . . .
JShadzi at aol.com
JShadzi at aol.com
Wed Jan 29 10:48:18 EST 2003
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Mike, its hard to say exactly what each mod nets power wise, but here is a
list of mods I would recommend anyone to consider in stages:
1 - filter, advance timing, and free flow exhaust, a good gain in midrange
and top end power
2 - uprated cam, this will help take advantage of the stage 1 mods above, IME
this will net about 130hp in a 2.2.
3 - port head, intake manifold, install bigger displacement bottom end, which
is what I really recommend for you in the long run, motors can be had these
days for a song. This is about all you can do in one of these cars before it
starts getting expensive and diminishing.
HTH,
Javad
In a message dated 1/29/2003 6:51:47 AM Pacific Standard Time,
armanmik at earthlink.net writes:
>
> >Subject: Re: 160Hp from a N/A 4000CSQ?
> >
> >Jesse, IMO the figures on the Blau site are pushing it a bit, 160 is in
> the=
> >ball park for a well breathed on 2.3 10:1 motor as Ben mentioned. A
> good=
> >port job, bigger valves (40mm intake), 270 cam or so, triple downpipe ala
> =
> >4kq, 2.25-2.5" exh, free flowing filter (I know, but I think it makes a
> dif=
> >ference when you're trying to squeeze every amount of flow. I don't think
> =
> >boring out the TB will do anything, its plenty big on these cars. Oh yes,
> =
> >I port the lower runners of the intake, blend the inlet of the TB (in the
> m=
> >anifold), and port match the ports. No need to touch the exh. manifold,
> no=
> >t much you can do to it anyway. Igntion is good as is, just advance a
> litt=
> >le, run 91/92 and make sure all parts are clean and new. This motor
> should=
> >put out a solid 150 crank hp and rev cleanly to the revlimiter about
> 6800r=
> >pm. Anything more would require a 2.6 bottom end, at which point about
> 170=
> >is possible with much more torque.
> >
> >HTH, lemme know if you have any questions.
> >
> >Javad
> >80tq.com
>
>
> Well I do . . .
>
> Starting with a bone stock 108 HP 2.1 liter NA engine in an 86' 5000, what
> would you do to get to the following power outputs? (Assuming I'm not
> asking for any major trade secrets.)
>
>
> 120 HP?
>
>
> 130 HP?
>
>
> 140 HP (probably the limit for this engine and still be usable as a daily
> driver which also doesn't demand a strict diet of aviation fuel.)?
>
>
> How many of the needed parts could come from the pic-n-pull (like an NG
> head, for instance)?
>
>
> I'd sure like to have 125 hp for not a lot of money (unless I'm totally
> dreaming).
>
>
>
>
>
> Best Regards,
>
> Mike Arman
>
>
>
More information about the quattro
mailing list