NG vs 20V

[Dave K.]

turbo turbo turbo
The 7A is a great motor but the turbo gives you more opportunity for more
power (now or later).
Just think, the ultimate upgrade for most of us CQ owners is a turbo motor -
20v preferred but 10v will do.
Just my thoughts...

Dave K.
'90 CQ


----- Original Message -----
From: "shoemakersp" <shoemakersp at comcast.net>
To: "Quattro List" <quattro at audifans.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 02, 2003 10:07 PM
Subject: NG vs 20V


> Wondering if I could solicit a little advice on repowering my early build
> '84 CGT that currently has the WE code 2.1L(solid lifter) with CIS.  I
> obviously have many options, but with my goals for the car a fun time
street
> plaything, maybe some like track day I am looking for 150-160HP(most
likely
> naturally aspirated).  I would prefer a smooth pull and retaining some low
> end grunt over having an overly peaky top end, but I do want it to rev.
> Given a $2000 dollar budget with several options such as:
> 1.  An NF bottom end with preferable a NF top end with a total rebuild,
> port and polished head, Quattro exhaust manifold, a 272(or so) cam and a
> 200 flywheel.
> 2.  A 20V(7A I think) basically stock and just what it takes to get it
> back to stock along with the conversion to Motronic.
> 3.  The low comp WE bottom end with a stock MC head and turbo.
>
> Thanks to everyone for your time and consideration.
>
> '84 CGT (down to fuel pump, snow snow, go away, give me just one above
> freezing day)
> '87 5kTQ Wagon (down to throw out bearing, ok maybe two days)
>