80Q various track Q's

[Brady Moffatt]

Hi Jim/Javad/All,

I must have missed some of this thread.

Why were the Eibachs compressed so much? Normally, IME with lowering
springs, you don't even need a spring compressor to remove them, and if you
do, it's only for that last little bit.

There's still something fishy here.....

Of course, it's about to become moot!

Cheers,
Brady Moffatt
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
83 UrQuattro with 51,000 miles
86 4ksq with 310,000km
86 4ksq parts car
72 Datsun 240Z with 180,000 miles
92 VW Golf with 200,000km FOR SALE
in middle stages of quattrosis accumulatus

----- Original Message -----
From: <JShadzi at aol.com>

> Jim, I'm surprised that's what Ken recommended to you, I'm running 280's
in
> the front and the ride is anything but soft, lemme know how it feels,
> fortunately spring rates quite affordable and easy to change.
>
> Javad
>
> In a message dated 5/7/2003 8:34:18 PM Pacific Standard Time,
> jeg1976 at yahoo.com writes:
>
> > After asking around and talking to Ken at 2Bennett, we
> > decided on 315's all the way around for a firm
> > streetable Colorado car.  He said they will probably
> > be slightly softer than the progressive Eibach pro-kit
> > I have on right now because my springs are compressed
> > so much. I should have them and the Koni's in after
> > this weekend.  I'll definatly post the results.
>


---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.476 / Virus Database: 273 - Release Date: 25/04/03