I've been busy
Brady Moffatt
bradym at sympatico.ca
Sun Jan 11 16:19:14 EST 2004
Oops, sorry, I meant what was the difference between WR and GV. I own a
granny pusher WX so it was kind of an autopilot W_ brain fart!
So the GV is an emission-friendly WR? And the WX is just slow...
Maybe someone actually knows the subtle differences. My curiosity needs to
be satisfied!!
Cheer,
Brady
-----Original Message-----
From: quattro-bounces+bradym=sympatico.ca at audifans.com
[mailto:quattro-bounces+bradym=sympatico.ca at audifans.com]On Behalf Of Antti
Piirainen
Brady Moffatt wrote:
> But what differentiates it from a WX? Catalytic converter?
GV is very close to WR, whereas WX being a low-emission granny-pusher is
a whole another story.
Apparently the differences between GV and WR are very subtle, but also
very unknown to myself. I belive Switzerland has also been quite strict
about emissions compared to the general level in Europe in the eighties
- but then again, wouldn't they have sold the WX in there? To confuse
more, that's exactly what they did. And where does Sweden fit in the
picture?
--
Antti Piirainen
87 Cq
More information about the quattro
mailing list