Things to look for: 2001 A4
Richard Beels
beels at technologist.com
Tue Jan 20 01:22:47 EST 2004
105 or 120K I think - seems _frighteningly_ long.... :-)
Going to see/pick-up the car tomorrow. Buying a car for the father-in-law
is more fun than buying one for yourself. I get to buy him a laptop,
VAG-COM, new Bentley's, ... <g>
At 01/19/2004 at 23:26, Shakespearean monkeys danced on Stephen Kormilo's
keyboard and said:
>The car is a V6, so the above doesn't _really_ apply. IIRC, the most
>common form of early timing belt failure on the V6 engine was due to water
>pump failure, which was usually preceded by water pump coolant leaks, and
>wasn't nearly as common as the tensioner failures on the early 1.8T
>engines. Also, by the 2000 MY the 1.8T's had the redesigned tensioner
>that doesn't appear to be prone to premature failure.
>
>So, IMO, changing the timing belt, etc. at 60K miles is a little early,
>OTOH I certainly would do it well before Audi's recommended interval
>(which I cannot remember right now).
>
>
>I don't disagree with checking the plugs, probably a good idea to replace
>them at 50K miles if it hasn't been done yet, and properly torque them,
>but it's highly unlikely that the V6 has been chipped. Also, I have only
>heard of this problem occurring on turbo-charged engines.
Cheers!
More information about the quattro
mailing list