US Formula 1 race great for Ferarri, bad for Michelin
Frederick Smith
smitty at pcrealm.net
Sun Jun 19 23:55:45 EDT 2005
The one set of tires rule has made things interesting in F1 this year.
Michelin smirked as Bridgestone struggled with their compounds early on,
of course having "7" teams testing and supplying data didn't hurt
Michelin's effort either. Bridgestone had "3" teams........ well "1"
team + Jordan and Minardi. (let's call it 1.5 teams)
The one set of tires rule isn't very smart from other standpoints
though, including that of safety. Kimi Raikonnen lost his front
suspension one lap from victory due to having flat spotted a tire,
luckily Jenson Button wasn't collected in the process. Besides that, pit
work and tire changes are an integral part of racing............ a team
sport!! F1 has seen fit to dispense with that element and while the
magic that has been performed by the tire manuf. has produced some
amazing results regarding tire wear and traction the bag of tricks was
found lacking this weekend. Ferrari set their cars up for the track that
"everyone" practiced AND qualified on and Bridgestone brought a tire
that was up to the task.................. Michelin failed miserably at
Indy, disappointed 100,000+ F1 fans in attendance at the track and who
knows how may world-wide viewers. For that faux pas they should be held
accountable, it was their sole responsibility. The FIA upheld the rules
of the series, Ferrari took a hard line and refused to give ground to
concessions............ they were prepared properly and F1 is big
business unfortunately (annual total race team expenditures
$2,500,000.000 [F1 Racing April 2005]) Let's suppose that there were a
"one make tire rule" (as proposed) with the same mistaken choice as
today................. 100k fans get to watch a military fly-over, then
they get to go home!! F' with it 'till you break it seems to be the
mantra of Ecclestone and Mosely, what a team!
More information about the quattro
mailing list