tirefitment 200 quattro Digest, Vol 40, Issue 1

LL - NY larrycleung at gmail.com
Thu Feb 1 10:27:47 EST 2007


Yes as to the stock offsets.

However, as the rim width goes up, the offset needed to keep the contact
patch in it's proper relationship does (eventually) have to shrink (at least
for
our positive offset vehicles).

For this case, ET 35 vs. ET38. Pretty well a wash (1/8" towards the
centerline
of the car). If the rubbing issue is towards the inside, then this can be
fixed
with a 3 mm spacer.

LL - NY

On 2/1/07, SuffolkD at aol.com <SuffolkD at aol.com> wrote:
>
> Was the original question  a wheel rubbing issue on a 200 20V?
> IIRC, the Milliga wheel was a 38 ET.  Isn't the 20V (3B) a 35 ET and the
> 10V
> 45 ET?
> -Scott by BOSTON
> >
> > Yes, 200 20V
> >
> > OEM was 215 60 15's. Optional was 225 50 16. The 225 50 16 is .2 shorter
> > than stock. 215 55 16's are .2 bigger than stock in diameter.
> >
> > Tires I have now (225 55 16's)are .7 larger, but due to width and height
> > ended up with a interference problem on outer edges in rear (with load).
> >
> > Eric
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> quattro mailing list
> quattro at audifans.com
> http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/quattro
> ---
> Watch this space for ads :)
>


More information about the quattro mailing list