Mobil 1 oil weight
Taka Mizutani
t44tqtro at gmail.com
Tue May 1 08:03:10 EDT 2007
Once again, you're spouting misinformation.
The OLD Pennzoil Platinum was 100% PAO based, group V basestock.
The NEW stuff is the same hydrocracked group III stuff that everyone now
calls synthetic.
Whether you doubt it or not, you're just plain WRONG- it was 100% PAO based,
that's why I have about
30qts. of it in the garage.
The basestock of an oil is not OPINION, it's FACT. Just because you choose
to believe incorrect information doesn't make it right. The formulation has
nothing to do with personal preference.
I'm not talking about performance, I'm talking about the base stock of the
oil- my post was directly addressing the fact that your INCORRECT
information about oil basestock is pure misinformation.
BTW, I paid $2.25/qt. for my 100% PAO group V Pennzoil Platinum, so $5-7 qt.
doesn't fly.
If you want to learn anything, you need to actually do some research, not go
off half-cocked with outdated information and a lot of conjecture, which is
what you've been doing for the last several posts on this topic.
STOP POSTING WRONG INFORMATION- YOU'RE NOT HELPING ANYONE.
Taka
On 4/30/07, Ameer Antar <antar at comcast.net> wrote:
>
> To me, I think this is a matter of personal preference like coke vs.
> pepsi. I'm
> surprised to only hear a couple opinions though...
> These are all called fully synthetic. I'm know that Penzoil is PAO-based
> too,
> but I seriously doubt that it's 100% PAO due to the expense. I just have a
> hard
> time believing that one company is selling oil that's so much better and
> expensive to make for about the same price as another.
>
> To me, the important thing is how it performs. Just comparing specs for
> 5w30
> Mobil 1 and Penzoil Platinum, the Mobil 1 specs are a little bit better:
>
> Pour point: M1: -54C, PP: -39C
> Flash point: M1: 230C, PP: 196C
>
> The flash point is definitely important for a turbo motor. And, looking at
> the
> viscosity, M1 is actually thicker at both 40 and 100C.
>
> I think this is really a preference issue. I doubt most of us will
> actually
> feel the difference, but I think it's good to know that what you're
> getting is
> the best option within reason... I mean I think $5-7 a quart is a lot of
> money,
> and I'm not about to special order any oil.
>
> Just my 2 cents.
> -Ameer
>
>
> -------------------- Original Message --------------------
> From: Taka Mizutani [t44tqtro at gmail.com]
> To: Ameer Antar [antar at comcast.net]
> Cc: Quattro List [quattro at audifans.com]
> Date: 4/30/07 6:04:07 PM
> Subject: Re: Mobil 1 oil weight
>
> No, check bobistheoilguy forums. You're wrong. Mobil 1, in any
> formulation, is
> NOT PAO based any longer.
>
> Show me a current sample and spectrophotometry results to back it up like
> the
> guys on BITOG.
>
> The quote you have below- "Mobil 1 with SuperSyn uses high-performance
> fluids, __including__ polyalphaolefins (PAOs)"
>
> That's the big out- "including," meaning that it is not the only base,
> which it
> used to be.
>
>
> Taka
>
>
>
More information about the quattro
mailing list