Narrowing down my start issue (84 4kq) [with suggested procedure]
Ben Swann
benswann at verizon.net
Tue Aug 17 09:21:21 PDT 2010
Cody,
This is probably why they did away with the WUR and went CIS-E. Indeed, the WUR is the
main reason these fuel pressure tests were used. CIS-e does not use it (WUR) and
basically there is less need to do fuel pressure tests. BTDT thinking I'd trouble shoot
CIS-e the scame way as CIS, only to find out it became an irrelevant waste of time, and
all the connections were competely different from CIS.
This reminds me of the story about the old man called out of forced retirement to fix a
critical system so folks could have their Electiricity back. He used to work on the
system that he helped design and implement. The officials stood around watching as he
climbs down a manhole with a large screwdriver and comes up less than a minute later
after turning a control switch with the screwdriver. He hands them the $500 bill and
they complain - Why so much? since all he did was to turn a screw to reset a breaker.
He replied, " Yeah, but I know which screw on which control panel and in which manhole
in which street." "Come to think of it, don't you think I ought to charge you more -
how much is the outage costing you per minute?"
Ben
-----Original Message-----
From: John Cody Forbes [mailto:cody at 5000tq.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 17, 2010 10:14 AM
To: audi at humanspeakers.com
Cc: Ben Swann; quattro at audifans.com; Johnny B
Subject: Re: Narrowing down my start issue (84 4kq) [with suggested procedure]
I have two five gallon buckets filled to the brim with bad warm up regs diagnosed with a
simple fuel pressure test that takes 5 minutes. Changing parts on hunches and well meant
educated guesses may work for those with parts cars or a fleet of similar cars, but in
the professional world my customers don't want to hear "yeah I changed the temp sensor,
see if that works". There is a test procedure for everything that can lead to fixing
problems by only changing the things that are actually broken 90% of the time. I
understand that not everybody has all of the equipment that a shop does, but in this
case a fuel pressure gauge set is very inexpensive (cant they be had at Harbor Freight
for like $40?) and would take a minute or two to install and KNOW what is going on with
the fuel pump, injectors, DPR, and others. CIS is not like a carb or EFI system where
the system pressure is important, but can be 10% off before it's noticeable to the
driver. The system pressure on CIS is not even very important, but the control pressure
that controls the movement of the metering plate is *critical*.
Now with that all said, is it possible this problem is ignition related? OP mentioned
that the PO changed many things in the fuel system and had it looked at many times.
Could it possibly be that he was barking up the wrong tree? IIRC the car in question has
a basic ignition system (vacuum advance distributor, no ECU), right? It's sort of
unlikely, but maybe the advance is sticking all the way retarded for a time?
Also, a smoke test would be pretty useful just to be certain of the vacuum system. I've
made a "smoke machine" before out of a quart paint can with the lid soldered shut, some
WD-40 or ATF as smoke fluid, two pipes soldered to the sides to let air in and smoke
out, a propane torch to make the smoke, and an electric tire pump to do the air moving.
Sounds silly, but I discovered and fixed a few small leaks on a car that way.
-Cody (mobile)
On Aug 16, 2010, at 2:35 AM, Huw Powell <audi at humanspeakers.com> wrote:
>
>> Now that you have gotten to the point of things that Cody and Huw,
>> and others are pointing out, they may want to suggest clever ways to
>> do these tests. Although I have done most of these in my ownership
>> of CIS cars, in most cases I never needed to go to the point of fuel
>> pressure tests since I usually got things sorted by then.
>
> I have never - NEVER - seen any need for fuel pressure tests.
>
> Vacuum leaks and the resulting maladjusted static fuel mixtures,
> endlessly. On almost every CIS engine I have encountered.
>
> --
> Huw Powell
More information about the quattro
mailing list