urq Digest, Vol 77, Issue 35

[Cody Forbes]

But the feed to the pump from the fuel tank is too small at 3/8". The  
new canister would have a larger outlet to feed the pump. Since all of  
the return flow goes to the small canister the fuel tank would only  
need to replace the fuel that the engine consumed which the 3/8" pipe  
could handle easily. As stock the 3/8" feed must supply not only the  
fuel that the engine uses, but also all of the fuel that the return  
line dumped back into the tank.

-Cody (mobile)

On Mar 28, 2010, at 2:26 PM, Mike Del Tergo <mdeltergo at hotmail.com>  
wrote:

> I'd think there would need to be more to it?  Ben already has a 23  
> gallon "canister" just inches from the pump?!
>
>
>
> > From: Cody Forbes <cody at 5000tq.com>
> > Subject: Re: [urq] More Weird UrQ Behavior - fuel starvation
>
> > My idea for a possibly cleaner solution was a quart or so capacity
> > canister between the pump and the tank with the fuel return emptying
> > in to the little tank. You'd want the return entering radially along
> > the side so it swirls in to help separate any possible air bubbles.
>
>
> Hotmail has tools for the New Busy. Search, chat and e-mail from  
> your inbox. Learn More.