walk away

[John Cody Forbes]

Yeah I meant to write it that way but I guess I spaced. A double dose of nyquil will do that to you ;-)

-Cody (mobile)

On Feb 1, 2011, at 11:13 AM, Tony Hoffman <auditony at gmail.com> wrote:

> Dead on, except, the MC2/NG/NF cams are more aggressive than the MC1 cam. I used the MC1 cam because that's what I had laying around. I'd prefer the MC2/NG/NF cam, but didn't have one on hand.
>  
> Tony 
> 
> On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 8:43 PM, Cody Forbes <cody at 5000tq.com> wrote:
> I have some input here that might confuse this even more. Jim Green gained something like 20hp (at the wheels, no corrections, on a dynojet) on his MC1'd 90tq when he switched from the MC1 to MC2 cam. The Blau 272 cam made less power and torque than both the MC1 and MC2 cam. I think the 272 had too much overlap for the turbo engine (turbos and overlap don't get along well).
>  
> That doesn't say which is "more aggressive", but it is interesting related data.
>  
> I do think that you misread Tony a bit, but I could be wrong. I think the breakdown per Tony was:
>  
> 1. MC1 is more aggressive than MC2
> 2. MC2 is the same as NG/NF
> 3. 272 is the most aggressive of this selection
>  
> I have MC1, MC2, and I think an NF cam (it’s a 10v non turbo and I wrote the engine code on it, just forget right now). I could measure them up some day and provide empirical data.
>  
> -Cody