Fwd: failure notice

[Grant Lenahan]

email problem?

Begin forwarded message:

> From: MAILER-DAEMON at www-51-3.vfemail.net
> Date: July 28, 2011 8:05:37 PM EDT
> To: glenahan at vfemail.net
> Subject: failure notice
> 
> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at www-51-3.vfemail.net.
> I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
> This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
> 
> <j.d.larson at verizon.net>:
> 206.46.232.11 does not like recipient.
> Remote host said: 550 5.1.1 unknown or illegal alias: j.d.larson at verizon.net
> Giving up on 206.46.232.11.
> 
> --- Below this line is a copy of the message.
> 
> Return-Path: <glenahan at vfemail.net>
> Received: (qmail 70548 invoked by uid 89); 29 Jul 2011 00:05:36 -0000
> Received: by simscan 1.4.0 ppid: 70503, pid: 70545, t: 0.2589s
>         scanners:none
> Received: from unknown (HELO new-host.home) (Z2xlbmFoYW5AdmZlbWFpbC5uZXQ=@OTYuMjQyLjIyNS4xOTY=)
>  by mail.vfemail.net with ESMTPA; 29 Jul 2011 00:05:36 -0000
> Subject: Re: Gone To The Dark Side ...
> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> From: Grant Lenahan <glenahan at vfemail.net>
> In-Reply-To: <4E31EF2A.90001 at verizon.net>
> Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2011 20:05:32 -0400
> Cc: Kent McLean <kentmclean at comcast.net>,
> quattro <quattro at audifans.com>
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Message-Id: <1AD172C8-8209-433E-AB4D-69BC99F26E8A at vfemail.net>
> References: <p0624080bca51e538f7d9@[192.168.1.128]> <4E2C4751.1050703 at comcast.net> <3A3AD6BB-2894-487D-A2EA-8D453CF83C43 at vfemail.net> <4E31EF2A.90001 at verizon.net>
> To: John Larson <j.d.larson at verizon.net>
> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084)
> 
> I am well aware of the IMS and planned to tell her about it. When the =
> clutch is out its a fairly easy - albeit $1500 - repair to put in the =
> gold-plated pone from LN engineering, as I did.=20
> 
> problem is over-blown, resulting in low prices (good) for solid cars =
> (good) that can be retrofitted for far less than the depreciation hit =
> (better)
> 
> Grant
> On Jul 28, 2011, at 7:22 PM, John Larson wrote:
> 
>> On 11:59 AM, Grant Lenahan wrote:
>>> Agree. Nice cars, and significantly easier to work on/ fix than many =
> audis.
>>> =20
>>> FWIW older boxsters are very good deals and extremely durable.  If =
> you ever get that desire again, email me - i can give you some good =
> guidance there.
>>> =20
>>> Grant
>>> On Jul 24, 2011, at 12:24 PM, Kent McLean wrote:
>>> =20
>>>> Fay Kelley wrote:
>>>>> 2007 328i
>>>> =20
>>>> BMWs are nice if you live where it doesn't snow.
>>>> Judging by the palm trees, that's a safe bet.
>>>> =20
>>>> Enjoy.
>>>> =20
>>>> --
>>>> Kent McLean
>>>> 1999 A4 Avant, V6 Tiptronic
>>>> 1990 200 Avant mit V8 conversion
>>>> gone: too many to count, including my first, "Bad Puppy"
>>>> =20
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> quattro mailing list
>>>> http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/quattro
>>>> http://www.audifans.com/kb/List_information
>>>> =20
>>> =20
>>> =20
>> Dunno how THIS one got by me!  Might wanna do a little research on =
> earlier Boxsters, and their big brother, too.  The engines have a =
> designed in catastrophic failure mode which usually results in shopping =
> for a new engine (priced at a level higher than the market value of the =
> car WITH a fresh engine).  Google "Boxster intermediate shaft bearing =
> failure" and peruse some of the links.  Scary.
>> =20
>> John
>> =20
>