NAC - British cars

[Steve]

The Spitfire is the exact opposite of the Audi. The Spit is the least 
complicated car I ever owned and the having the whole front end tilt 
forward makes working on it simple. The 5ktq is more complicated but has
 comfort and bun warmers. There is also the ability to drive thru the 
snow in a straight line.

I can fix nearly anything on the 
Spitfire with a pair of pliers and a screwdriver. I keep a can of ether 
and a set of points in the trunk of the Spit just in case. There is, as 
Steve mentioned, a smiles per gallon as well. 

I enjoy driving 
the Audi but the age combined with complexity does leave a tiny bit of 
anxiety. There are a lot of aging rubber pieces and gizmos on it. I keep
 an alt belt in the trunk and figure there is not enough room in the 
trunk to cover all the weirdness that can happen

--- On Tue, 4/16/13, Huw Powell <audi at humanspeakers.com> wrote:

From: Huw Powell <audi at humanspeakers.com>
Subject: Re: NAC - British cars
To: "Dan DiBiase" <d_dibiase at yahoo.com>
Cc: "quattrolist" <quattro at audifans.com>
Date: Tuesday, April 16, 2013, 12:47 AM

I'd love to have a Triumph Spitfire.

Or a Spitfire...

- Huw

On 4/15/2013 5:06 PM, Dan DiBiase wrote:
> Ok, I'm just curious, since I saw them mentioned n a couple of recent posts - how many of us have British sports cars as
> well as our Audis? I think I saw a '57 TR-3, and an A-H 100...  I have 2 MGB's, a '76 driver and a '65 project..... Anyone else?
>
> Dan D
> '04 A4 1.8Tq MT-6
> Central NJ USA
> _______________________________________________
> quattro mailing list
> http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/quattro
> http://www.audifans.com/kb/List_information
>
_______________________________________________
quattro mailing list
http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/quattro
http://www.audifans.com/kb/List_information