[s-cars] RS2

[Paul Krasusky]

Ah, Jim...

<<<Just around town though, going to MTM 1+ from stock made a bigger
difference than going from MTM 1+ to RS2 turbo and EM if that makes
sense.>>>

<<<As far as bang for the buck goes, just the MTM (or Lehman software for
$100 extra) is the way to go as long as your gas is good quality.  The RS2
turbo and EM cost a lot for the extra gain they give.>>>

...I finally get an answer that is intelligible (no spicy green bean /
espresso cocktail here ;) ! )

While I have not yet driven Brian's with the new bits, you're comments
pretty much support his initial sentiments.  I don't believe he's spent any
time driving it, just the brief test drive to ensure proper working order.
It seems that 5,500-7k he'll be pleasantly surprised.

Again, all my post was looking to do was to confirm your thoughts above,
which now, finally, it has.  NOT a Shakespearean debate of "to RS2 or not to
RS2" or "plug you G-Spot, er, Tech, up your bunghole and only post empirical
results".

It was asked.

It was answered.

And I thank you.

P.S.  no worries on your 'hoar' getting around, heh heh, BTDT, I actually
encourage it!  Like a doorknob, everyone gets a turn...

Paulie "overly sensitive today and apparently in need of a good Massenguill"
K.
CT
'95 //S6 with NASA afterburners, quad 117mm howitzers, G-suit, time/space
continuum transfunctioner, 7th fetzer valves, 30-weight ball bearings, etc.
'58 TR3A with twenty-turboed-V20 motor (twin Dodge V10s welded together,
turbos for each cylinder)