[s-cars] RS6 Vs. ????
Robin St.Clair
uberseehandel at yahoo.com
Tue Jun 25 18:00:57 EDT 2002
--
[ Picked text/plain from multipart/alternative ]
Guys
There has been some speculation about comparisons between the RS6 and other=
super sedans, such as the M5.
I was even amused to see requests for magazine comparisons with the M5. On =
this topic I only have two observations:
You still believe journalists??????
And for those that still believe, the German Motoring Press is comparing=
the RS6 to Porsche Turbos. The M5 is being compared to the Jaguar S Type R.
The torque curve of the RS6 renders a gearbox redundent - not required. Sur=
e you can use the paddles, but why, the car does everyrhing you want withou=
t fiddling with paddles. As somebody said "...think Modena 360 F1, without =
the Jerks..".
Even the brakes are pretty good, not fantastic (and my comparison is abso;u=
te, not relative) but pretty good. Tap them a couple of times and the rear =
seat driver is grabbing his stomach. The suspension is a revelation, the st=
eering feels good, think communicative, bumps and holes are absorbed.
Surprise, the ESP is sporting in character, the rear end will go out withou=
t ESP's intervention, though power slides require its deselection.
What this car excels at is long distance fast cruising, with one exception,=
at 175 MPH, you are burning 46 litres per 100 km (5.12 mpg US), so frequen=
t stops for gas, and it revels in high octane.
Getting up to speed moves heads backwards, no matter the load, cornering is=
unlike any recent Audi.
Dilemmas, yes - 18" or 19" wheels, until the rumored 19" high speed (runfla=
t?) from Michelin appears, the fast guys are sticking with the 18" rims for=
their higher speed and load rating. in case any of you think this is a bit=
wimpy, Audi find tyre pressures important enough that they through in a re=
mote tyre pressure monitor, by no coincidence, so did Porsche with their 95=
9=2E
I asked a senior AOA person why they were not bringing the Avant to the St=
ates and was told that theS6 Avant was a dog on the market, and that they w=
eren't making that mistake again. mark you, I believe the S6 was the mistak=
e, not the Avant, poor value for money!
Arounfd the time I drove the RS6 i also drove a highly refined RS4, with 's=
orted' brakes and suspension, and a well tuned engine. The RS6 still impres=
sed.
Much of the speculation about the car is based on the non-realisation of th=
e paradyme shift this car embodies. Shame really, so few places to apprecia=
te it as it is built to perform. Shortly after the Le Mans race finished, I=
was able to discuss the engine with its designer, who had to scratch his h=
ead somewhat, after all, he did the job in 1986 and Audi has been waiting f=
or brakes and chassis ever since. To fill the idle moment, the self-same de=
signer occupied himself with the design of the R8 engine in recent years.
For those of you who insist on manual shifting, there is a solution, at a p=
rice, oh, and expect to see the cars at a race track near you next season.
R+C
---------------------------------
Do You Yahoo!?
Sign-up for Video Highlights of 2002 FIFA World Cup
More information about the S-car-list
mailing list