[s-cars] RS6 Vs. ????
Bruce Bell
bbell at surview.com
Wed Jun 26 00:02:25 EDT 2002
OK 2400/232=10.3 lbs/hp
RS6 at 4200(?)/450=9.3 lbs/hp
Should be enough difference to compensate for the losses due to the tip.
probably shifts a lot faster too! I'm a manual transmission fan too. Last
cars I had with a slush box were a '59 coupe Deville (great car for the
dating years!) and a 64 1/2 289 pony convertible. I suspect the tip is
nowhere near that world. The paddles should be great fun and Sibelius would
sound much better. On track days, I might turn up the heat a bit and play
opera! In my other life I want a Morgan, a lotus 7 and... sigh.....
Bruce
-----Original Message-----
From: s-car-list-admin at audifans.com
[mailto:s-car-list-admin at audifans.com]On Behalf Of TM
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 8:40 PM
To: robin.stclair at web.de; s-car-list at audifans.com
Subject: RE: [s-cars] RS6 Vs. ????
a big pig isn't going
to be
very satifying on the track compared to something like a '70 911 w/ a
3.2 Carrera
motor- 2400lbs., 232hp, you do the math.
Taka
More information about the S-car-list
mailing list