[s-cars] Bypass valves - Which one?
Mihnea Cotet
mik at info.fundp.ac.be
Mon Dec 8 14:30:19 EST 2003
Yup Scott, agreed, but what about using a catch tank with a return line to
the oil pan??? A friend of mine from the UK with a 400 HP S2 has done that,
the idea is excellent as the oil consumption is reduced to almost nothing
(barely what gets burnt in the chambers due to tired piston rings).
Just a thought...
Mihnea
At 14:20 8/12/2003 -0500, QSHIPQ at aol.com wrote:
>Actually Minhea, small amounts of oil, even in vapor form, are enough to make
>a difference. In vapor form, it's now part of your 'Air' in the A/F ratio.
>Given what I see in perfectly good CIS cars with wet oil PCV, I'm not with
>your conclusion. Oil also tends to help exacerbate hotspots in the
>combustion
>chamber.
>
>Put another way, when you see perfectly good I5's at the track emptying a
>quart of oil from a catch can per day, where would that oil go without
>one? Ever
>wonder why at track events, oil consumption reaches extremely high levels in
>a perfectly normal S car? I don't. I might add that reducing the
>aeration of
>the oil is key as well (read: Big oil coolers = good). For more on this SAE
>970922 Development of Modern Engine Lubrication Systems - coauthored by Uwe
>Geiger Audi AG
>
>SJ
>
>
>In a message dated 12/8/2003 1:10:03 PM Central Standard Time,
>mik at info.fundp.ac.be writes:
>Though, with regards to detonation/pre-ignition, I guess it would take
>$hitloads of oil puking through the breather in order to produce
>detonation, but then it would mean that the engine is so FUBAR that it
>doesn't need to have any performance anymore...
More information about the S-CAR-List
mailing list