[s-cars] Alternatives to RS2 Injectors

Bruce Mendel Brucem105 at comcast.net
Fri Feb 20 16:30:35 EST 2004


Mihnea, it sure is nice having on the board.

Twelve second response times from an expert at no charge...you have to love
that. :)

B
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mihnea Cotet" <mik at info.fundp.ac.be>
To: "Dave Forgie" <forgied at ae.ca>; <s-car-list at audifans.com>
Sent: Friday, February 20, 2004 4:18 PM
Subject: Re: [s-cars] Alternatives to RS2 Injectors


> Dave, you must be mistaken, RS2 injectors are 354cc/min at 3 Bar rail
> pressure. 44lb or 48 is way too big and I'd only recommend such injectors
> for 450+ real and crank HP.
>
> 12 ohm injectors are ok for the stock ECU, but I'd rather recommend you
> Lucas 37lb/hr injectors if you're after RS2 power levels.
>
> HTH,
>
> Mihnea
>
> At 14:11 20/02/2004 -0700, Dave Forgie wrote:
> >S-gruppees, and Pizzo:  A group of us in Vancouver are at the edge of the
> >slippery slope and are in on the RS2 GP.  Naturally, we need all the
other
> >bits that go with it.  We have split up the searching/procurement duties
> >and one of mine is to find a cheaper source/alternative for the RS2 Bosch
> >injectors.  We understand that these injectors are 444 cc/min (about 42
> >lb/hr)  and were the same as those instand OEM in a "911" Carrera.  One
> >aftermarket "dealer" has quoted me $185 CDN for one such injector (I
don't
> >think so, Tim).  So I went out at lunch to a local Camarustang Speed shop
> >where they have a really cool Turbonetics catalogue (but that's another
> >story) and ACCEL (tm) fuel injectors.  They list a series of injectors
for
> >the 993 Carrera turbo.  For a 48 lb/hr set of six (150648), I have been
> >quoted $463 CDN.  For a single 150144 (44 lb/hr) injector I have been
> >quoted $65 CDN each.   Both of these ones seem to be 12 ohms impedance
> >(whereas others seem to be 14.4 Ohms).  So three questions:
> >
> >1.  Should I continue to pursue this Accel option?
> >2.  Will 12 Ohm injectors be okay?
> >3.  Which of the two options, 44 lb/hr or 48 lb/hr is "better" (whatever
> >that is)?
> >
> >Dave F.
> >
> >_______________________________________________
> >S-CAR-List mailing list
> >S-CAR-List at audifans.com
> >http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/s-car-list
>
> _______________________________________________
> S-CAR-List mailing list
> S-CAR-List at audifans.com
> http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/s-car-list



More information about the S-CAR-List mailing list