tubo vs super -- Re: [s-cars] was, 0-60 , 1/4mile,now:Re:
superchargers are bad, mmkay?
Kirby Smith
kirby.a.smith at verizon.net
Sat Jun 5 12:51:32 EDT 2004
Things to consider: Is your bypass valve functional or leaking? Are you
using too heavy of an oil? Mobil 1 15W-50 vs 10W-40 makes a difference,
even in warm weather, I perceive. Don't try to operate the engine in
lug mode, i.e., full throttle under 2500 rpm. There is only so much an
Audi DOHC system can compensate for. Is your wastegate frequency valve
in need of replacement?
kirby
Bill Clancy wrote:
>
> but, read into this. I am asking for help man.
> has anyone been able to get the turbo to respond quicker? if you read
> the data, it is supposed to have 265 ft-lbs of torque at 1800.
> ahhh.....I'm not getting that. I need 3000 rpm to get torque.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Bill Clancy" <clancybill at yahoo.com>
> To: "Dave Forgie" <forgied at direct.ca>; <s-car-list at audifans.com>
> Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 8:59 AM
> Subject: Re: tubo vs super -- Re: [s-cars] was, 0-60 , 1/4mile,now:Re:
> superchargers are bad, mmkay?
>
> > OK... you got me. yes, I bad mouthed the S-car.
> > but my argument/question was why not a supercharger? Mercedes makes
> that
> > SLK kompressor. I have never driven one, so I don't know if it is any
> > good.
> >
> > thanks for your feedback.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Dave Forgie" <forgied at direct.ca>
> > To: <s-car-list at audifans.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2004 8:50 AM
> > Subject: tubo vs super -- Re: [s-cars] was, 0-60 , 1/4mile,now:Re:
> > superchargers are bad, mmkay?
> >
> >
> > > Bill: Your San Francisco hill story has more to do with having a
> > > standard transmission instead of an automatic than it does about having
> > > a turbo instead of a supercharger. If I had to live in San Fran (and I
> > > visit fairly often), my daily driver wouldn't be a heavy car with a
> > > standard. It would be something automatic. Same for bumper to bumper
> > > commutes anywhere. The S-car was not developed to service that need.
> > > Or at least not a std. trans S-car (they had autos in Europe, even on
> > > the 20vt).
> > >
> > > I don't think your arguement holds. Regardless, rather than continuing
> > > to bad mouth the S-car, you should probably just sell it, and get
> > > something with a sport-matic/ tiptronic/manumatic. Everyone will be
> > > happier, even your favorite chick.
> > >
> > > Dave F.
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > S-CAR-List mailing list
> > > S-CAR-List at audifans.com
> > > http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/s-car-list
> >
>
> _______________________________________________
> S-CAR-List mailing list
> S-CAR-List at audifans.com
> http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/s-car-list
More information about the S-CAR-List
mailing list