RE: [Audi20V_Kruemmer] Re: [s-cars] Re: tubular exhaust manifold and turbo options

[MLP]

>-----Original Message-----
>From: captmagu at aol.com [mailto:captmagu at aol.com]

>> For 400-450 hp, even 3" is on the small side.”
 
>That's what our cars were screamin at us while they were on
>the dyno. 

No doubt, but going up in size from 3" to, what's the next "commonly
available" SS pipe & muffler diameter, seems to me would be a
substantial, and expensive undertaking.

>> SECOND, vis-à-vis Audi's 2.7L twin turbo EM design and
>> Are these just a packaging design problem for the twin
>> turbo engines or a performance design goals as well?
>> 
>That probably has a lot to do with TEC building my turbo with
>a number 6 hotside. 
>

What surprises me more vis-à-vis turbo "experts" charts & graphs and
prognostications, 
is pushing that much exhaust, and power out op the Garrett T3 families
Stage 3 @2.229" (56.6mm) exducer bore.  Which A/R did TEC use?  It's got
to be pushing that turbine wheel hard.



Mike

>Hap, woohooin in Evahboost, Maguire
>