[s-cars] Adventures in S-car hoses

[Tom Mullane]

Well call me a ricer if you will, but I would really like to go with Samco
to match my other Samcos.  However, if it shortens the wait considerably,
I'd vote SFS.

Tom
(Please do NOT send me emails calling me a ricer)


Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2004 15:03:36 -0400
From: Joe Pizzimenti <joe.pizzimenti at gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [s-cars] Adventures in S-car travels
To: Emre Washburn <yumyjager at gmail.com>
Cc: Scar <s-car-list at audifans.com>
Message-ID: <521f4dda04091012033afd9af0 at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII

Emre, et al:
That MAF to airbox hose isn't pressurized, so you don't really need 1"
thick carbon kevlar stainless unobtanium piping.

Porta-Pizzo


On Fri, 10 Sep 2004 12:02:05 -0400, Emre Washburn <yumyjager at gmail.com>
wrote:
> Personally I would want Samco, as a few of the people who have gotten 
> the SFS's had commente on how it was thinner then Samco. I don't mind 
> droping the extra $20 for a more quality product.
> 
> 
> --
> Emre
> 92 //S4
> 90 Cq
> 40 valves to many!
>