[s-cars] Re: S-CAR-List Digest, Vol 16, Issue 32

[RM]

There were a handfull of I5's obd2 compliant, mainly the 96-up S6's which 
were made into 1997 I believe. They are very rare however. I also dont think 
that 12/31/95 was that critical, rather any car dubbed as a 1996 MY car had 
to have OBD-2 electronics.

Rolf

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <Mtgadbois at aol.com>
To: <s-car-list at audifans.com>
Cc: <mark.pollan at mci.com>; <waves at epix.net>
Sent: Thursday, February 10, 2005 2:32 PM
Subject: Re: S-CAR-List Digest, Vol 16, Issue 32


> Gentlemen:
>
> Please correct me if I am wrong, but I thought no I5 engines were OBD-II 
> compliant.  The reason being that Audi did not want to pay to certify the 
> engine.  The beginning date for OBD-II was model year 1996 or manufactured 
> after 12/31/95.
>
> Mark near Chicago
>
>
>
>
>
> Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2005 11:25:55 -0500
> From: Mark Pollan <mark.pollan at mci.com>
> Subject: RE: [s-cars] ARGH!!  Stalling at idle
> To: s-car-list at audifans.com
> Message-ID: <003001c50f8d$3243d9c0$96f1fea9 at mcilink.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>
> Hi Rolf:
>
> Thank you for this post and your direct post to me.  The car actually 
> starts
> fine hot or cold.  It sometimes takes a few more cranks than other times 
> but
> otherwise uneventful.  My 95.5 is OBD-1.  I think the 97s are OBD-2.
>
> Yes, I am nearing wits end with this one and thought one last hurrah 
> before
> taking it in for "proper" diagnosis was in order.  My dilemma is finding a
> trusted technician in the DC/Suburban Maryland area.
>
> Mark
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: s-car-list-bounces at audifans.com
> [mailto:s-car-list-bounces at audifans.com] On Behalf Of RM
> Sent: Thursday, March 10, 2005 11:11 AM
> To: s-car-list at audifans.com
> Subject: Re: [s-cars] ARGH!! Stalling at idle
>
>
> Mark, no matter what anyone says, fuel pressure is not the issue here. FP 
> is
>
> vacuum adjusted, not temp. driven. Yes, in effect the FP reg. could be 
> bad,
> but it would affect more than just cold starts. The CTS is the leading 
> input
>
> to the ECM for cold starts. Check here first. Having said all this, your
> 95.5 is possibly OBD-2 compliant and requires proper experience, info
> systems and tools to diagnose correctly. Most anyone can visually look for
> problems (broken vacuum lines or hoses) and most everyone can replace
> sensors and switches out of frustration. I have at my disposal the real
> factory info system and thousands of $$$ of quality diagnostic tools, and 
> i
> still can find difficulty finding problems, esp. with older cars that have 
> a
>
> few miles on them. Unless this is a common problem with these cars, which 
> it
>
> isn't all that common, you'll be subject to allot of specualtion and that
> could cost you more than if you took it to a trusted technician.
>> Rolf Mair
>> waves at epix.net
>>
>> 94 UrS4
>> 90 20v turbo 90q
>> 69 camaro conv.
>> 02 Allroad (wifes)
>>
>
>
>
>
> -- 
> Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
> Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
> Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.7 - Release Date: 2/10/2005
>
> 



-- 
Internal Virus Database is out-of-date.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.300 / Virus Database: 265.8.7 - Release Date: 2/10/2005