[s-cars] To ceramic coat or not
manuelsanchez at starpower.net
manuelsanchez at starpower.net
Fri Jan 6 12:59:54 EST 2006
Dave,
thanks. that's what I love about the list, often makes me
think counter to what I had originally thought. The turbulence
helping flow as opposed to hindering is a case in point. Seems
to make sense when I think about it in terms of what I had
heard about porting heads.
Thanks again for the info on your own ceramic coating
experience, it reinforces an opinion I'm forming. I bought a
ceramic coated header for my truck (got tired of the warping
EM and broken studs so I thought what the hell). It came
coated from the vendor, and I'm not sure who did the coating,
but after a few months large sections on the cross over pipe
flaked off. I'm glad (but really sorry) it wasn't just me.
-manny
---- Original message ----
>Date: Fri, 06 Jan 2006 11:13:13 -0500
>From: djdawson2 at aol.com
>Subject: Re: [s-cars] To ceramic coat or not
>To: manuelsanchez at starpower.net, s-car-list at audifans.com
>
> I'll give you my 2 cents worth.
>
> I had my header Swain coated 1 year and 2 months
> ago...and 36k miles ago... and only on the
> exterior. It has held up fairly well, but
> significant sections have become bare. With that
> alone in mind, I wouldn't consider coating the
> inside of a header or downpipe I owned. If it
> doesn't last on the outside, it can't have a prayer
> on the inside.
>
> As far as flow is concerned... there exists a good
> arguement in support of "surface turbulence"
> improving flow rather than hindering it. However,
> if the DP is 3" (or more), I doubt you could ever
> tell the difference in power output.
>
> Dave
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: manuelsanchez at starpower.net
> To: s-car-list at audifans.com
> Sent: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 08:22:04 -0500
> Subject: [s-cars] To ceramic coat or not
>
> S-heads,
>
> Thanks for the input so far.
>
> I thought I had recently seem some opinions about coating the
> inside of components;
>
> 1. There was a concern that as the ceramic coating flaked off
> or deteriorated, that the bits would lodge in downstream
> components, such as the kitties. Do these coatings
> deteriorate quickly, slowly? How do they deteriorate? Is this
> a valid concern?
>
> 2. Interior coating is not "smooth" as the uncoated metal,
> presumably this would disturb the flow. Do the benefits of
> keeping the heat from the metal outweigh the diturbed gas-flow?
>
> Look forward to your input.
>
> -manny
> 95.5 UrS6 Avant
> _______________________________________________
> S-CAR-List mailing list
> S-CAR-List at audifans.com
> http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/s-car-list
More information about the S-CAR-List
mailing list