[s-cars] 3071 turbo & Pastore RS2 code question

[Mtgadbois at aol.com]

Gents,
 
I will agree with Dave.  I don't like pinging. I don't want to  modulate my 
right foot either.  I had MTM+1 and it would ping - wasn't  a happy camper.  I 
went RS2 with Mihnea and no more pinging.  I did  lose about 1.5 to 2 mpg.  
However, when I drove thru Wisconsin and got a  tank of 93 I got an additional 
50 miles to that tank.  Must be the ethanol  in Chicago.
 
Boost on,
 
Mark near Chicago
 
 
Prior dribble:
 
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:35:43 -0700
From: "Dave Forgie"  <forgied at ae.ca>
Subject: Re: [s-cars] 3071 turbo & Pastore RS2 code  question
To: <yumyjager at gmail.com>
Cc:  s-car-list at audifans.com
Message-ID:  <s4200f7a.049 at mail.ae.ca>
Content-Type: text/plain;  charset=US-ASCII

Emre:  You must have missed the fact that we run 94  Chevron with  
techron already in it.  Plus we have relatively cool  weather.  All reasons
why we shouldn't be pinging on "pastore" software  that was sold as plug
and play, no issues software.  Rather than ruin my  engine with the  
pinging I was "dreaming", I switched to MRC  software.  Rich, yes. Pinging,
no.  Sean D.'s Dahlback (MTM)  software makes a few more ponies but the
cost of the software was very high  (US$900 IIRC).   

Dave F.

>>> "Emre Washburn"  <yumyjager at gmail.com> 03/21/06 01:25PM >>>
Dave,

No one  is saying you and your cronies aren't pinging, we are saying
that not  EVERYONE pings with that software. Maybe it's your crappy
Canukistanian  gas?

Remember, MRC software runs VERY rich, so pinging would be a  non-issue
with that software, but so would a loss of power. I want to go UP  the
slippery slope, not DOWN.


--
Emre
92 //S4
90 Cq
40  valves 'O plenty!