[s-cars] Bilstien Sport Shocks with 92 Springs, anyone using this setup?
hoog23 at aol.com
hoog23 at aol.com
Thu Jul 19 09:14:22 EDT 2007
I have a set of '92 springs in the Rossottobin (sp?) and from the limited research I have done?specifically for the?'92 springs?I'm thinking of going with the Sports.? Another option I was considering was the boge turbogas.??I've heard positive comments about both?the Sports and the?turbo gas but did hear one or two negatives about the turbo gas with the '92 springs.
Dave
-----Original Message-----
From: James Murray (QB/EMC) <james.murray at ericsson.com>
To: LL - NY <larrycleung at gmail.com>; Steve Marinello <smarinello at entouch.net>
Cc: Audi S Car List <s-car-list at audifans.com>
Sent: Wed, 18 Jul 2007 10:11 pm
Subject: Re: [s-cars] Bilstien Sport Shocks with 92 Springs, anyone using this setup?
Thanks, and that's exactly why I asked the question... the 92 are slightly lower
93 to 97 North American standard springs, but not as low as H&R's...the 92's are
probably about mid way...
So are HD's the best fit or Sports?...
/J.
________________________________
From: LL - NY [mailto:larrycleung at gmail.com]
Sent: Wed 7/18/2007 9:17 PM
To: Steve Marinello
Cc: James Murray (QB/EMC); Audi S Car List
Subject: Re: [s-cars] Bilstien Sport Shocks with 92 Springs, anyone using this
setup?
Hmmm, thanks Steve, muddy the waters. ;-)
So, Jamu, perhaps, if you order the shocks from a decent supplier, (I used
www.shox.com <http://www.shox.com/> ) they'll be able to tell you the best
application then. If the 92 springs are a 20 mm drop from stock later springs,
I'd venture a guess that Sports may be more appropriate, my Eibach's dropped the
car about 20 mm. Didn't know the 92 springs were shorter, just thought they were
stiffer.
YMMV, my $0.02
LL - NY
On 7/18/07, Steve Marinello <smarinello at entouch.net> wrote:
The '92 springs sit lower than the later springs, but I never had a
stock car to compare to, only the Eibach/Bilstein avant. I'd guess 20
mm; 0.75".
LL - NY wrote:
> Jamu,
>
> If the ride height of the 92 springs is stock height for all of the
springs,
> then you need
> to use Bilstein HD's. When I bought my UrS6, the PO had installed Bilstein
> Sports with
> stock S6 springs. I drove over a not visible "whoop de doo" at public road
> speeds and
> topped out the shocks. Two days later I had two leaking struts. Don't
> believe that would've
> happened if I had my Eibach's on the car or Bilstein HD's. So the overall
> length of the shock body/shaft of the Sports must be shorter than HD's
> contributing to the out of travel experience.
>
> HTH,
>
> LL - NY
>
> On 7/18/07, James Murray (QB/EMC) < james.murray at ericsson.com> wrote:
>
>> Anyone use this combo? How does it ride.. Looking for feedback
>>
>> Or should the Bilstien Sports only be used with H&R or Eibach combo...
>>
>> Just wondering cause I remember the following: "The valving for
>> Bilstiens is EXACTLY the same between "Sport" and "Heavy Duty". The
>> piston length on the Sport shock is shorter however, enabeling the car
>> to ride in the "sweet spot" at the appropriate ride level for a car with
>> a lowered suspension (what you want if you are going to use lowering
>> springs)."
>>
>> So are the 92 low enough for Sport shock or should the HD be used?
>>
>> /Jamu.
>> _______________________________________________
>> S-CAR-List mailing list
>> S-CAR-List at audifans.com
>> http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/s-car-list
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> S-CAR-List mailing list
> S-CAR-List at audifans.com
> http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/s-car-list
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
S-CAR-List mailing list
S-CAR-List at audifans.com
http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/s-car-list
________________________________________________________________________
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.
More information about the S-CAR-List
mailing list