[s-cars] Exhausting Morning

[Tom Green]

In my defense, I did say timely answers, not everything.  Once you can  
interpret 50% of the offerings from JC and pkrasusky-OK, 25%-you will  
have the culture whipped.  All it takes is the
discipline to ignore all that stuff while sorting out what is  
important to you.  If you visit infrequently, this also means looking  
beyond the front page, since yesterdays posts will probably be on page  
3 already.

A fair portion of these folks meet in CT every year.  You get senior  
status only after you can't remember names from those you met face to  
face last year.  This pseudonym thing does not help much.  There are  
some pathetic cases that are fighting hard against the aging process,  
which can interfere with rational thought but somehow we get along.

Certified Luddite,

Tom



On Feb 4, 2014, at 2:50 PM, Douglas Landaeta wrote:

> S-heads,
>
> Maybe it's a generational thing, but I have difficulty navigating  
> the short bursts of words on QW. The meat of the conversation is  
> only in a few spoons of the stew. Here, each message appears to  
> encompass complete thoughts, written in legible, full, and  
> oftentimes grammatically accurate sentences.
>
> But alas, there are so many more UrS4/UrS6 enthusiasts there, doing  
> all kinds of stuff to their rides and sharing every step of the  
> slope. Utter gratitude to DF for herding the cat-like morsels of  
> facts and cataloguing the information. It is definitely worth that  
> weekly stew.
>
> Or maybe I'm just an old fart and don't quite know those guys by  
> first name yet!
>
> Doug
> UrS owner since 2001
>
> Sent from my mobile
>
>> On Feb 4, 2014, at 12:59 PM, Peter Schulz <p.schulz at verizon.net>  
>> wrote:
>>
>> Hey, I like archaic…
>> Luddite in the making…
>>
>> -Peter
>>
>>
>>
>>> On Feb 4, 2014, at 11:38 AM, Tom Green wrote:
>>>
>>> Paul,
>>>
>>> Now that you have "found" quattroworld's UrS4/UrS6/S2/RS2 forum,  
>>> you can ditch this archaic method of getting timely answers.  Your  
>>> issue there will be the opposite problem;  The
>>> sheer volume of information will be difficult to keep up with and  
>>> sort out relevant threads.
>>
>> -Peter Schulz