[urq] (no subject)

Mike Sylvester msylvester at verizon.net
Fri Aug 11 10:33:20 EDT 2006


No.  On the type 44 the ball joint is part of the control arm.
and a totally different setup.

Mike

>From: Max Hoepli <mhoepli at vif.com>
>Date: 2006/08/10 Thu AM 11:32:13 CDT
>To: Mike Sylvester <msylvester at verizon.net>, urq at audifans.com
>Subject: Re: [urq] (no subject)

>Are these the same as on the type 44?
>
>Max
>
>
>----- Original Message ----- 
>From: "Mike Sylvester" <msylvester at verizon.net>
>To: <urq at audifans.com>
>Sent: 10, August 2006 11:39
>Subject: [urq] (no subject)
>
>
>> The RR ball joints certainly are not cheap.  When I bought mine, the ball
>joints were more expensive than the RR control arms.
>>
>> The control arms were $98 and the ball joints $120.
>> This was back when 1 euro = $1.
>>
>> BTW, the RR control arms are not alloy as rumour states.  The only
>difference between the RR control arm and the CQ is the sway bar bushing is
>installed on the RR.
>>
>> Mike
>>
>> ------------------
>> Martin wrote...
>>
>> Or just get the proper 20v RR ball joint which is still available and the
>> same cost as the CQ part.. :)
>>
>> Cheers
>>
>> Martin Pajak
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Audifans urq mailing list
>> Send posts to: mailto:urq at audifans.com
>> Manage your list connection: http://www.audifans.com/mailman/listinfo/urq
>> Have an urq question?  Check the Audifans Knowledgebase!
>> http://www.audifans.com/twiki/bin/view/Audi/UrQuattro
>> Have an urq answer? ... Please help others by adding to the KB ... all
>contributions welcome!



More information about the urq mailing list