[urq] What is everyone's opinion about Audi's parts house, cleaning?
James Bufkin
jbufkin at austin.rr.com
Sun Jul 30 10:16:01 EDT 2006
Thats interesting and sad Info Nathan.
I think its a final blow for parts. Completely inconsistent with what
Audi is trying to become which is a luxury sports car maker.
If I look on Ebay, I can find classic well maintained Mercedes cars from
about every year of the 50s and 60s. Mercedes also has an active
hertiage department to keep these cars running. Sure a fuel pump for a
1930s Mercedes might be 3000 dollars, but it is available and the owner
doesn't have to rig up a substitute. The point is that those Mercedes
are worth almost a quarter of a million dollars so nobody will care
about spending that money to maintain complete original spec.
The Urquattro was the closest thing to a Classic that Audi had. Values
were actually going up! The cars where at the point where a proper
amount of factory support to replicate little cheap parts that break
often would go along way with their owners. Audi should keep in mind
that the owners of these cars are quite active and respected in the Audi
community and often influence new car purchases or are directly
responsible for friends and family buying new Audis. Dis-enfranchising
this group because the bottom line says its not fiscally in the green to
make bumper cover plugs for 11,000 cars is BAD business.
I have just this past weekend spoiled the sale of a Q7. I won't replace
my A8L or my wife's A6 with another Audi. I will keep my urquattro and
my rally car although I won't show my rally car at ANY Audi shows and
will only run it on track debadged henceforth. If Audi doesn't want to
deal with urquattros then I certainly don't want to be an unpaid
salesman for them. It pretty much means we have to scrounge and
scavenge for every single part on our beloved quattros. Screw Em.
James Bufkin
More information about the urq
mailing list